...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Divisibility, Arranger Liability Issues At Center of 2015 Superfund Cases
【24h】

Divisibility, Arranger Liability Issues At Center of 2015 Superfund Cases

机译:2015超级基金案例中心的除法,安排者责任问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Settlement risks, divisibility questions and arranger liability issues made 2015 an "interesting" year in Superfund litigation, attorneys said during a webi-nar hosted by the American Law Institute. The common thread in the Dec. 17 webinar with a panel of Superfund lawyers was one of lingering uncertainties in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act-35 years after the law was enacted. "This year is one of the most interesting to study," Richard Faulk, of Hollingsworth LLP's office in Washington said. When it comes to settlements, Faulk said, "We're getting into a series of problems the courts are compounding exponentially." "CERCLA settlement jurisprudence is about as improvisatory as one can imagine," Faulk said, citing differing approaches taken by the circuits for calculating Superfund settlement liability in contribution claims against non-settling parties.
机译:律师在美国法学院主持的网络研讨会上说,和解风险,可分性问题和安排人责任问题使2015年成为超级基金诉讼中“有趣的一年”。 12月17日与超级基金律师小组举行的网络研讨会的共同思路是,法律颁布35年后,《综合环境响应,赔偿和责任法》的不确定性仍然存在。华盛顿霍林斯沃思律师事务所办公室的理查德·福克说:“今年是最有趣的一年。”在和解方面,福克说:“我们正面临一系列法院在成倍增加的问题。”福克说:“ CERCLA和解法理学几乎是可以想象的,”法尔克援引各巡回法庭在计算针对非和解方的供款索偿中的超级基金和解责任时采取的不同方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号