...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Law Backs Appeals Court Water Rule Review, Government Argues
【24h】

Law Backs Appeals Court Water Rule Review, Government Argues

机译:法律支持上诉法院水规则审查,政府争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A federal appeals court that reviews EPA-mandated water pollution permits also should have jurisdiction over the underlying regulation that defines which waters receive those protections, the government told the U.S. Supreme Court. In the July 28 brief, Justice Department attorneys told the Supreme Court it was "inconsistent" to have a federal appeals court review individual permit decisions, but leave a federal district court to rule on which waters fall under federal jurisdiction (Nat'l. Ass'n. of Mfrs. v. DOD, U.S., No. 16-299, 7/28/17).
机译:政府告诉美国最高法院,审查EPA规定的水污染许可证的联邦上诉法院也应对定义哪些水获得这些保护的基本法规具有管辖权。在7月28日的摘要中,司法部律师告诉最高法院,由联邦上诉法院审查个人许可决定是“前后矛盾的”,但由联邦地方法院裁定哪些水域属于联邦管辖范围(纳特·阿斯)。诉美国国防部(Mfrs。v.DOD),美国,第16-299号,7/28/17)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号