The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide whether challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency clean water rule, which seeks to clarify Clean Water Act jurisdiction, properly lie in federal district courts or a specific federal appeals court (Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. DOD, U.S., No. 16-299, cert, granted 1/13/17). The high court Jan. 13 granted a request filed by the National Association of Manufacturers, which asked the court to determine whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit erred when it claimed exclusive jurisdiction to decide petitions to review the Obama administration's waters of the U.S. rule.
展开▼
机译:美国最高法院同意决定,对旨在澄清《清洁水法》管辖权的环境保护局清洁水规则的质疑应适当地存在于联邦地方法院或特定的联邦上诉法院(Mt. v的Nat'l Ass'n v (美国国防部,编号16-299,证书,授予1/13/17)。 1月13日,高等法院批准了美国全国制造商协会的请求,该请求要求法院确定美国第六巡回上诉法院在主张对法院复审奥巴马政府水域的请愿书作出专属管辖权时是否犯了错误。美国统治。
展开▼