首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Judges Weigh Immunity for World Bank Arm in India Pollution Case
【24h】

Judges Weigh Immunity for World Bank Arm in India Pollution Case

机译:法官对印度污染案件的世界银行武器的豁免权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A panel of appellate judges grappled Monday with whether an international financier can be held liable in U.S. court for funding a coal-fired plant that residents of a nearby village in India claim wrecked their air and water. Budha Jam v. International Finance Corp.- argued at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit-is seen by some as a test of whether international funding groups with U.S. offices can be sued in American courts for international pollution. The lawsuit made its way to the Supreme Court in 2019. It was appealed after a subsequent lower court decision let the International Finance Corporation off the hook the following year for pollution in a fishing village on India's Gujarat coast. At issue is whether the U.S.-based activities of the World Bank arm, also called IFC, were commercial actions that led to the harms alleged in the complaint. Budha Ismail Jam and fellow fishermen sued the IFC in 2015 over the $450 million loan that financed the Tata Mundra Ultra Mega Power Project near their village.
机译:周一召开一个上诉法官的小组与国际金融家是否可以在美国法院举行责任,以资助燃煤工厂,该燃煤工厂是印度附近村的居民声称破坏了空气和水。 Budha果酱v。国际财务公司 - 在美国哥伦比亚地区的美国院外上诉法院辩论 - 在某些人的考验中被视为与美国国际融资团体无论是否有国际融资团体。该诉讼将于2019年前往最高法院。在随后的较低法院决定后,将国际金融公司在印度古吉拉特海岸的渔村污染下,将国际金融总公司脱离。问题是世界银行武器的基于美国的活动,也堪称国际金融公司的活动是导致投诉所谓的危害的商业行动。 Budha Ismail Jam和Sishermen于2015年起诉IFC,超过4.5亿美元的贷款,为他们的村庄附近提供了塔塔曼德州Ultra Mega Power Project。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号