Nat'I Parks Conservation Ass'n v. EPA

摘要

In environmental groups' petition in U.S. Court of Appeals for Third Circuit to review EPA approval of Pennsylvania Clean Air Act state implementation plan, groups may not bring claims challenging Environmental Protection Agency finding that program under separate rule constitutes better-than-best available retrofit technology, or claims challenging EPA's decision to approve states' reliance on rule as better-than-BART, because: (1) both determinations stem from separate rule and rulemaking proceedings not addressed in EPA's SIP approval, and (2) challenges to nationally applicable rules must be brought in District of Columbia Circuit.