首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter - Cases >Waste Action Project v. Astro Auto Wrecking, LLC
【24h】

Waste Action Project v. Astro Auto Wrecking, LLC

机译:废物行动项目诉Astro Auto Wrecking,LLC

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Auto wrecking facility is liable for deferred $50,000 penalty under Clean Water Act and must complete injunctive relief, because: (1) even though environmental group did not establish that facility failed to submit certain discharge monitoring reports or that facility discharged stormwater containing copper in violation of its national pollutant discharge elimination system permit, group established in citizen suit 1,595 previously determined violations and that facility failed to implement best management practices required by its stormwater pollution prevention plan, complete corrective action for oil sheen, and sample stormwater discharges during 19 quarters, totalling roughly 4,015 violations; (2) facility did not establish affirmative defense that its berm and trench system was as effective as required BMPs; (3) federal district court determined that injunction was appropriate equitable remedy; and (4) substantial penalty would put facility out of business, hamper facility's efforts to comply with required injunction, and not further purposes of act.
机译:根据《清洁水法》,汽车清障设施应处以50,000美元的罚款,并必须完成禁制令,因为:(1)即使环保组织未确定该设施未能提交某些排放监测报告或该设施排放的含铜雨水违反了其国家污染物排放消除系统许可,在公民诉讼中成立的团体(1,595个先前确定的违规行为),以及该设施未能执行其雨水污染预防计划要求的最佳管理实践,对油光的完整纠正措施以及在19个季度中对雨水排放进行采样的总计约有4,015次违规; (2)设施没有建立肯定的防御,即其护堤和沟渠系统与所需的BMP一样有效; (3)联邦地方法院裁定,禁令是适当的公平补救措施; (4)重大处罚将使设施瘫痪,妨碍设施遵守必要禁令的努力,而不是进一步的行动目的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter - Cases》 |2017年第8期|1413-1420|共8页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:06:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号