首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter - Cases >Asarco, LLC v. Union Pac. R.R.
【24h】

Asarco, LLC v. Union Pac. R.R.

机译:Asarco,LLC诉Union Pac。 R.R.

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Mining company may bring certain contribution claims against two railroad companies under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act for share of costs company incurred to clean up contaminated mine site, because: (1) even though railroad companies are entitled to contribution protection for past releases from certain sites covered in consent decrees they entered into with federal government and for pollution migrating from those sites, mining company may bring claims for contamination released by companies into mining site that are not covered by consent decrees; (2) questions of material fact exist as to whether there is final prior judgment on merits for same claim or cause of action that would bar contribution claim under doctrine of res judicata; and (3) mining company has not taken inconsistent litigation position in bankruptcy proceedings that misled court and that would create unfair advantage and bar claim under doctrine of judicial estoppel.
机译:根据《综合环境响应,赔偿和责任法》,矿业公司可能会针对两家铁路公司提出清理某些污染矿场的成本公司的某些出资索赔,原因是:(1)即使铁路公司有权获得过去的出资保护与联邦政府达成的同意令所涵盖的某些场所的排放,以及从这些场所迁移的污染,采矿公司可能会提出对公司所释放的污染物的索赔,但这些排放并未被许可令所涵盖; (2)是否存在实质性事实问题,即对于同一索偿案的优劣或诉讼因由是否存在最终的事先判决,该判决会否决根据既判原则提出的分摊索偿案; (3)矿业公司在破产程序中并未采取不一致的诉讼立场,这种做法会误导法院,并会根据司法禁止性原则产生不正当利益并禁止索赔。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter - Cases》 |2017年第1期|1058-1080|共23页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:06:25

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号