首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Polarizing informality: Processual thinking, materiality and the emerging middle-class informality in Taipei
【24h】

Polarizing informality: Processual thinking, materiality and the emerging middle-class informality in Taipei

机译:两极分化:台北的过程性思维,实质性和新兴的中产阶级非正式性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent debates, it has been argued that urban informality is a way of living. It is the consequence of people negotiating with building regulations, limited resources and their living environments. However, as some researchers have pointed out before, informality is not just the experience of subalterns; in some cases, it has become the shared experience of people across different classes. This paper therefore employs processual thinking and materiality to demonstrate how urban informality was formed and has been transformed through negotiations between people, local authorities and political realities. By thinking about Taipei's informality as a negotiating process, informality can thus be understood as the co-production process of squatters' struggle for a living in the city and the state's attempt to mobilize political support. As new construction materials have prompted varied illegal construction forms, attracting new people to build illegal constructions, the demographic change has also changed the people-state relations. The state's governance of illegal construction therefore has been leaning towards private property owners with illegal add-ons, leaving squatter settlements vulnerable to demolition. In the case of Taipei's transforming urban informality, this paper argues that informality is not merely the result of poverty, and should not be romanticized as a way to live outside the housing market or the modern planning regime. On the contrary, it should also be examined for its impacts on the existing class differences and inequality in urban populations.
机译:在最近的辩论中,有人争辩说城市的非正式性是一种生活方式。这是人们与建筑法规,有限的资源及其居住环境进行谈判的结果。但是,正如一些研究人员之前指出的那样,非正式性不只是子代的经历,更重要的是非正规性。在某些情况下,它已成为不同阶层的人们共享的经验。因此,本文采用过程性思维和实质性来证明城市非正式性是如何形成的,以及如何通过人,地方当局和政治现实之间的谈判而改变的。通过将台北的非正规性视为谈判过程,可以将非正规性理解为屋居民为在城市中谋生而进行的斗争和国家动员政治支持的共同过程。随着新的建筑材料促使各种非法建筑形式出现,吸引了新人们建造非法建筑,人口变化也改变了人与国家之间的关系。因此,该州对非法建筑的治理一直偏向于带有非法附加物的私有财产所有人,使擅自占地者的住所容易被拆毁。对于台北正在发生的城市非正规性转变,本文认为,非正规性不仅仅是贫困的结果,不应被浪漫化为一种在住房市场或现代规划制度之外的生活方式。相反,还应该检查它对现有的阶级差异和城市人口不平等的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号