首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Planning. C, Government and Policy >Devolution and the welfare state: lessons from early childhood education and care policy in Wales
【24h】

Devolution and the welfare state: lessons from early childhood education and care policy in Wales

机译:权力下放与福利国家:威尔士幼儿教育和护理政策的教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The author analyses the scope and limits of the policy autonomy devolved to the Welsh Assembly Government (WAG). He engages with James Mitchell's application of Ted Lowi's seminal analysis of 'policy types' to Scottish devolution. These concepts are used to frame a case study of Welsh early childhood education and care (ECEC), demonstrating extensive innovation in Wales concerning the form of ECEC and its impact on compulsory schooling. However, there is some evidence that innovation in the form of ECEC has not been matched by sufficient increases in spending. Although echoing Mitchell's account of the fiscal limits to devolution, the author suggests a greater scope for policy innovation than Mitchell detects. The discrepancy suggests that there is room for refinement of the 'policy-types' framework, to draw attention to 'regulatory' aspects of public service provision; it may also hint that, although formally weaker, the WAG has more potential for policy innovation than the Scottish Executive.
机译:作者分析了移交给威尔士议会政府(WAG)的政策自治的范围和限制。他参与了詹姆斯·米切尔(James Mitchell)对泰德·洛维(Ted Lowi)对“政策类型”的开创性分析对苏格兰权力下放的应用。这些概念被用来构筑威尔士幼儿教育和照护(ECEC)的案例研究,展示了威尔士在ECEC的形式及其对义务教育的影响方面的广泛创新。但是,有证据表明,支出增加不足,无法实现ECEC形式的创新。尽管赞同米切尔关于权力下放的财政限制的说法,但作者提出了比米切尔发现的更大的政策创新范围。差异表明,有必要完善“政策类型”框架,以引起人们对公共服务提供的“监管”方面的关注;这也可能暗示,尽管在形式上较弱,但WAG比苏格兰行政院在政策创新方面具有更大的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号