首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Endogenous versus exogenous development: a comparative study of biotechnology industry cluster policies in South Korea and Singapore
【24h】

Endogenous versus exogenous development: a comparative study of biotechnology industry cluster policies in South Korea and Singapore

机译:内生与外生发展:韩国和新加坡生物技术产业集群政策比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

With this study we aim to develop a theoretical understanding and to assess policy implications of cluster development in the context of a knowledge-driven, globalizing Asian economy. We will examine both the strengths and the limitations of recent biotechnology cluster policies in South Korea and Singapore. We argue that the two states share similar experiences in terms of the state's proactive role as a cluster creator, but that they have promoted biotechnology industry clusters in contrasting ways due to different national politics and political institutions. South Korea places more emphasis on endogenous capabilities, while Singapore highlights the importance of exogenous capabilities in biotechnology cluster development. By analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of these contrasting cluster policies, we evaluate the long-standing debate between endogenism and exogenism in the study of regional development. Instead of these dualistic approaches, we employ a global production network analytical lens for understanding the dynamic interactions between localized growth factors (endogenous) and globalizing external factors (exogenous) in the context of Asian biotechnology cluster development. We adopt a multipart strategy that includes archives, surveys, in-depth interviews, and secondary source data collection in order to enhance the validity and reliability of the data.
机译:通过这项研究,我们旨在发展一种理论上的理解,并在知识驱动的全球化亚洲经济背景下评估集群发展的政策含义。我们将研究韩国和新加坡近期生物技术集群政策的优势和局限性。我们认为,就该州作为集群创建者的积极作用而言,这两个州有着相似的经验,但是由于不同的国家政治和政治制度,它们以相反的方式促进了生物技术产业集群。韩国更加强调内生能力,而新加坡则强调了外生能力在生物技术集群发展中的重要性。通过分析这些不同的集群政策的优缺点,我们评估了区域发展研究中内生与外生之间的长期争论。代替这些二元方法,我们使用全球生产网络分析透镜来了解在亚洲生物技术集群发展的背景下局部增长因素(内生)和全球化外部因素(外生)之间的动态相互作用。为了提高数据的有效性和可靠性,我们采用了包括存档,调查,深入访谈和辅助源数据收集在内的多部分策略。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and planning》 |2009年第4期|612-631|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Public Administration, Korea University, Anam-Dong, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 136-701, Korea;

    Department of Humanities, Bedok South Secondary School, 1 Jalan Langgar Bedok,Singapore 468585;

    Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University, 599 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号