【24h】

Reviews

机译:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Can anyone define 'sustainability', 'sustainable development', or one of the many other permutations of the word 'sustainable' that permeate our culture today? That is a question that many people are asking and contributors to this book are seeking to answer. But it does not propose a new and embracing definition to add to that of the Brundtland Commission (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987) or the 3 Es (environment, economy, and equity) of the triple bottom line (Elkington, 1998). That task would be as unsatisfying as it would be unsuccessful. "Sustainability, like democracy, faith and freedom, is hard to define concisely" (page 33). I suspect it will always remain so; forever standing as an aspiration more than an end goal or defined state. So, wisely, the contributors seek to define sustainability by history and example. They focus their lens on the policies that sought to foster environmental protection and track them as they evolved from 1970 to the present. The reader is then left to the task of creating his or her own definition. The book is highly satisfying and informative.
机译:谁能定义“可持续性”,“可持续发展”,还是当今渗透到我们文化中的“可持续”一词的许多其他排列方式之一?许多人都在问这个问题,而本书的撰稿人也在寻求答案。但是它并没有提出一个新的,具有包容性的定义来增加布伦特兰委员会(世界环境与发展委员会,1987年)或三重底线的3 Es(环境,经济和公平)(Elkington,1998年)。 。这项任务将是不令人满意的,也将是不成功的。 “很难像民主,信仰和自由一样,对可持续性作出明确定义”(第33页)。我怀疑它会一直如此。永远比最终目标或定义的状态更抱负。因此,明智地,贡献者试图通过历史和实例来定义可持续性。他们将目光投向了旨在促进环境保护并追踪其从1970年至今的政策。然后,让读者负责创建他或她自己的定义。这本书令人非常满意并且内容丰富。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and Planning》 |2010年第1期|189-194|共6页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:37:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号