首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Planning >Who rebounds in the private transport sector? A comparative analysis between Beijing and Tokyo
【24h】

Who rebounds in the private transport sector? A comparative analysis between Beijing and Tokyo

机译:谁在私营交通部门反弹?北京和东京的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study explores the direct rebound effect, which indicates the degree of increase in travel demand caused by the increasing vehicle efficiency in the private passenger transport sector. Different from the usual effect, here the direct rebound effect is not assumed to be the same for the entire population. To determine when rebound occurs and who is suffering, two types of triggers, which may lead to different rebound effects among the population, are investigated: vehicle efficiency and travel demand. The quantile regression method is adopted to measure the rebound effect and differentiate it with respect to vehicle efficiency and travel demand. Considering that the rebound effect might have diverse performance in different cities, a comparative analysis between Beijing and Tokyo is conducted. Drawing on the data collected in a household energy consumption survey in Beijing and Tokyo in 2009, the models are estimated and the results reveal significant heterogeneity of the direct rebound effect both in Beijing and Tokyo, but with a much more complicated form in Beijing. For travelers in Beijing, rebound only occurs to those people whose cars are less efficient than 15-18 km/L, and the magnitude of the rebound effect is between 31.8% and 60.2%, varying across travelers with different travel demands. In comparison, in Tokyo, only travelers with low and medium kilometers traveled have the rebound effect, and the effect is inversely related to their travel demand, ranging between 17.1% and 92.3%. The above-identified inter-city and intra-city difference in the rebound effect could contribute to the population and a spatially specific policy scheme in practice.
机译:这项研究探讨了直接回弹效应,该效应表明了私人客运部门车辆效率提高引起的出行需求增加程度。与通常的效果不同,此处假定直接反弹效果对于整个人群而言并不相同。为了确定何时发生反弹以及谁在遭受痛苦,研究了两种类型的触发因素,它们可能导致人群中不同的反弹效应:车辆效率和出行需求。采用分位数回归方法来测量回弹效果,并根据车辆效率和旅行需求对其进行区分。考虑到回弹效应在不同城市可能会有不同的表现,因此对北京和东京进行了比较分析。根据2009年在北京和东京进行的家庭能源消耗调查收集的数据,对这些模型进行了估计,结果揭示了北京和东京的直接回弹效应存在显着的异质性,而在北京则更为复杂。对于北京的旅行者来说,反弹只发生在那些汽车效率低于15-18 km / L的人身上,反弹效果的大小在31.8%至60.2%之间,随旅行需求的不同而不同。相比之下,在东京,只有低公里和中公里旅行的旅行者才有反弹的效果,并且这种影响与他们的旅行需求成反比,介于17.1%和92.3%之间。上面指出的城市间和城市间反弹效应的差异可能会在实践中对人口和特定于空间的政策方案做出贡献。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and Planning》 |2016年第3期|561-579|共19页
  • 作者单位

    School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, China Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyoto University, Japan,Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyoto University, C-cluster, Kyoto-Daigaku-Katsura, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8540, Japan;

    Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, Japan;

    Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, Japan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Direct rebound effect; vehicle efficiency; heterogeneity; Beijing; Tokyo;

    机译:直接回弹效果;车辆效率;异质性北京;东京;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号