【24h】

Commentary

机译:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Writing in this journal, Ward (2007) provided a timely reminder of the importance of company - government relations in his commentary on the Casino debate, with his conclusion: "And, of course, lobby, lobby, lobby!" Ward's piece suggests that local authorities' representations to central government, and the alignment of major international casino operators with them, were important routes to influence. Whilst lobbying per se is not a new phenomenon, there are wider issues here concerning the involvement of large commercial organisations in the political and democratic process. The following commentary explores these ideas through focus on the UK's largest retailer, Tesco. This is not a critique of Tesco itself; rather, the company presents a highly illustrative case of corporate interactions and relationships with government in a UK context. Much of the ensuing discussion echoes some of the deliberations in Reich's (2007) Supercapitalism. Although he looks primarily to the US, Reich argues convincingly that democracy is being increasingly enfeebled as the spheres of big business and politics become ever more entwined.
机译:沃德(Ward,2007)在这本日记中写道,他在关于赌场辩论的评论中及时地提醒了公司与政府之间关系的重要性,他的结论是:“当然还有大厅,大厅,大厅!”沃德(Ward)的文章暗示,地方当局在中央政府的代表权以及主要国际娱乐场运营商与他们的结盟是影响的重要途径。虽然游说本身并不是一个新现象,但这里存在着涉及大型商业组织参与政治和民主进程的广泛问题。以下评论通过重点关注英国最大的零售商Tesco来探讨这些想法。这不是对特易购本身的批评。相反,该公司在英国背景下展示了公司与政府之间的互动和关系的高度说明性案例。随后的许多讨论都与Reich(2007)的超级资本主义中的某些讨论相呼应。尽管他主要着眼于美国,但赖希(Reich)令人信服地指出,随着大企业和政治领域的交织越来越紧密,民主正在日益衰弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号