首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Barriers to research collaboration across disciplines: scientific paradigms and institutional practices
【24h】

Barriers to research collaboration across disciplines: scientific paradigms and institutional practices

机译:跨学科研究合作的障碍:科学范式和机构实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a recent paper in this journal it was suggested that the conventional knowledge practices of disciplines are the fundamental obstacle to mutual understanding between academic experts. Such a position, we argue, underplays the institutional relationships that recreate expert and disciplinary divides. To demonstrate our case we discuss how in the UK the evolving relationship between the government and research councils has crucially altered the context for efforts to stimulate interdisciplinary research. Our analysis highlights the scope for changes in institutional structures and practices that would facilitate broader and more encompassing research into complex sustainability problems.
机译:在该期刊的最近一篇论文中,有人建议说,学科的常规知识实践是学术专家之间相互理解的根本障碍。我们认为,这种立场在重塑专家与学科鸿沟的制度关系上显得不足。为了证明我们的案例,我们讨论了英国政府与研究委员会之间不断发展的关系如何极大地改变了促进跨学科研究的环境。我们的分析强调了制度结构和实践变化的范围,这将有助于对复杂的可持续性问题进行更广泛,更广泛的研究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and planning》 |2009年第5期|1171-1184|共14页
  • 作者

    Philip Lowe; Jeremy Phillipson;

  • 作者单位

    Centre for Rural Economy, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England;

    Centre for Rural Economy, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号