【24h】

Reviews

机译:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The financial crisis is the Elephant of our time. Over the last couple of years, more than six wise men and women have written books purporting to explain the financial crisis and many more such books are surely in the works. Most of these wise ones suffer from the same limitations as the learned men of the poem. As each reaches out, he or she can make out only one small part of Our Elephant—maybe the rampant fraud at mortgage origination or the distortions of short term profit seeking or the complexity of the Collaterized Debt Obligation-Squared—but go on to confidently opine on the essential nature of this beast. The Subprime Virus is cut above the books that have come before it because of its authors' breadth of knowledge of financial institutions and consumer protection. Kathleen Engel and Patricia McCoy come to this project after many years of writing rigor ous, data-driven scholarly articles on banking and consumer law topics. Indeed, their 2002 Texas Law Review article, "A tale of three markets", is widely considered to be the seminal article on the law and economics of predatory lending and the two of them have been mentors to many who came later to this field (including me). In the book they slightly move away from their scholarship by revealing some of the frustrations that they have suffered over the years as their scholarly work on the subprime sector was dismissed by lending industry executives and government regulators who should have known better. So in 2011 they are entitled, like Cassandra, to demand, "Hear me! Understand!" The Subprime Virus is thus written as something of an indictment of many of the players who are responsible for various aspects of the crisis. That being said, the authors remain committed, through their scholarly work, to a careful analysis of the facts before them.
机译:金融危机是我们时代的大象。在过去的两年中,有六位以上的聪明人写过书,目的是解释金融危机,而且肯定还会有更多这样的书在写。这些智者中的大多数遭受与诗人一样的局限。当每个人伸出援助之手时,他或她只能分辨出我们大象的一小部分-可能是抵押贷款发起时猖fraud的欺诈行为,短期谋利行为的扭曲或协作债务义务方的复杂性-但要自信地继续认为这只野兽的本质是什么。由于它的作者拥有广博的金融机构知识和消费者保护知识,因此Subprime Virus不受限于之前的书籍。多年来,凯瑟琳·恩格尔(Kathleen Engel)和帕特里夏·麦考伊(Patricia McCoy)参与了这个项目,撰写了有关银行业和消费者法的严谨数据驱动型学术论文。实际上,他们在2002年的《德州法律评论》中的文章“三个市场的故事”被广泛认为是关于掠夺性贷款的法律和经济学的开创性文章,其中有两个是许多后来进入该领域的导师(包括我)。在这本书中,他们通过揭示他们多年来对次贷领域的学术研究遭到了贷款行业高管和政府监管机构的驳斥而略微偏离了他们的学业,这些人应该更了解。因此,在2011年,他们有权像卡桑德拉一样要求:“听我说!明白!”因此,次要病毒被写成对许多负责危机各个方面的参与者的起诉。话虽如此,作者仍然致力于通过其学术工作来认真分析摆在面前的事实。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and planning》 |2011年第9期|p.2253-2254|共2页
  • 作者

    K Engel; P McCoy;

  • 作者单位

    Who went to see the Elephant(Though all of them were blind),That each by observationMight satisfy his mind;

    Who went to see the Elephant(Though all of them were blind),That each by observationMight satisfy his mind;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号