...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Feminist inclusions in economic geography: What difference does difference make?
【24h】

Feminist inclusions in economic geography: What difference does difference make?

机译:经济地理中的女性主义内含物:区别有什么区别?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This special section of Environment and Planning A is the outcome of a panel we organized at the Fourth Global Conference on Economic Geography (GCEG) held in Oxford, UK in August 2015. The panel was intended to reflect on the role and influence of feminist work in economic geography; a sub-discipline distinguished by its heterogeneous theoretical and methodological approaches. In particular, it sought to encourage reflection on the extent to which economic geography as a sub-discipline has responded to feminist interventions that have drawn attention to the cultural construction of difference in ways that pose a challenge to its more generalized categories and frameworks of analysis (for example, regional development, labour, the firm, the state). Taking as our starting point, Linda McDowell's (1991) article 'Life without Father and Ford: The New Gender Order of Post-Fordism', which was published a quarter of a century ago (and revisited 10 years later, see McDowell, 2001), we asked to what extent and in what ways feminism (here referred to in the singular, but clearly 'feminisms' in practice) has changed the way economic geography is done? To what degree has the sub-discipline benefitted from the attention paid over the past 25 years to reproductive and domestic labour, the gender order and the interactions of categories of difference such as gender, class and race in our research enquiries?
机译:环境与规划A的这一特殊部分是我们在2015年8月于英国牛津举行的第四届全球经济地理全球会议(GCEG)上组织的一个小组的结果。该小组旨在反映女权主义工作的作用和影响。经济地理以不同的理论和方法论方法区别开来的子学科。尤其是,它试图鼓励人们反思经济地理作为一个子学科对女性主义干预措施的反应程度,这些干预措施以其挑战更为笼统的分析类别和框架的方式提请人们注意差异的文化建构。 (例如,区域发展,劳动力,公司,国家)。以我们的出发点为背景,琳达·麦克道尔(Linda McDowell,1991)的文章“没有父亲和福特的生活:后福特主义的新性别秩序”,发表于四分之一世纪之前(并于10年后重新审视,请参阅麦克道尔,2001)。 ,我们问女权主义(这里用单数形式指代,但实际上显然是“女权主义”)在何种程度上和以何种方式改变了经济地理学的方式?在过去的25年中,该子学科在研究研究中从多大程度上受益于对生殖和家务劳动,性别秩序以及诸如性别,阶级和种族等差异类别的相互作用的关注?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and planning》 |2016年第10期|2067-2071|共5页
  • 作者单位

    School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK;

    University of Kentucky, USA;

    Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号