...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Decarbonisation at home: The contingent politics of experimental domestic energy technologies
【24h】

Decarbonisation at home: The contingent politics of experimental domestic energy technologies

机译:在家进行脱碳:试验性国内能源技术的偶然政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Policy efforts to reduce the carbon intensity of domestic energy consumption have, over the last three decades, been dominated by an almost dichotomous reading of the relationship between technology and social change. On the one hand, there is a conception of personal responsibility that constructs domestic energy users as key actors in the adoption and (appropriate) use of low carbon energy technologies; from this perspective, environmental change becomes a matter of mobilising personal capacities such that individuals make better choices. On the other hand, decarbonising homes is conceived to be an outcome of top-down infrastructural interventions, with householders (or end users) positioned as relatively passive agents who will respond to engineered efficiency in linear and predictable ways. In practice, both positions have been found wanting in terms of accounting for how (and why) change happens and in turn delivering on ambitious policy goals. The argument we develop in this article goes beyond critiquing these problematic framings of technology and the locus of agency. Drawing on three contrasting low carbon energy technology projects in the UK, we present an alternative perspective which foregrounds a more experimental, ad hoc and ultimately provisional mode of governing with domestic energy technologies. We reflect on the meaning and political implications of this experimental turn in transforming (and decarbonising) domestic energy practices.
机译:在过去的三十年中,为减少家庭能源消耗的碳强度而进行的政策努力主要是对技术与社会变革之间关系的二分法解读。一方面,有一种个人责任的概念,使家庭能源用户成为采用和(适当)使用低碳能源技术的主要参与者;从这个角度看,环境变化成为调动个人能力以使个人做出更好选择的问题。另一方面,房屋脱碳被认为是自上而下的基础设施干预的结果,住户(或最终用户)被定位为相对被动的代理商,他们将以线性和可预测的方式对工程效率做出反应。在实践中,已经发现两个职位都希望说明如何(以及为什么)发生变化,从而实现宏伟的政策目标。我们在本文中提出的论点不只是对这些技术框架和代理机构的问题提出了批评。借鉴英国三个低碳能源技术项目的对比,我们提出了另一种观点,即采用国内能源技术的更具实验性,临时性和最终临时性的治理模式。我们反思了这一实验性转变在改变(和脱碳)国内能源实践中的意义和政治意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号