首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Questioning 'theorizing Sociospatial Relations'
【24h】

Questioning 'theorizing Sociospatial Relations'

机译:质疑“社会空间关系理论化”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

"Theorizing sociospatial relations" is a thoughtful and provocative foray into currentrnparadigms of socially specific spatial relations. It offers an effective critique of one-rndimensional models of such relations-namely, those that privilege territory, place,rnscale, or network as possessing exclusive explanatory and predictive value. On thernauthors' account, these models claim far more than they can deliver. Each givesrna partial analysis of the "concrete-complex" of sociospatial relations; none suffices torngive an adequate theory of the whole of such relations. In particular, each commits anrnerror of pars pro toto, and it does so by being too narrow and analytical, too vaguernin conceptual specification, or too reductionistic. Each declares itself to be uniquelyrnvalid for the grasp of the spatial aspects of social relations; thus each commits thernerror of being unduly "centrist" (eg, "place-centric", "network-centric", etc). Proceedingrnby a critique that is parallel to deconstruction in philosophy, the authors demonstraternthe blindness and shortcomings of such centrisms, which thereby fail to give the "thickrndescription" that spatial-social relations calls for.
机译:“使社会空间关系理论化”是对当前特定于社会的空间关系范式的一种深思熟虑的挑衅性尝试。它有效地批评了这种关系的一维模型,即那些对领土,地点,尺度或网络享有特权的模型,具有专有的解释和预测价值。从作者的角度来看,这些模型所要求的远远超出其交付的范围。每个给定部分分析社会空间关系的“具体复杂性”;没有一个足以为整个这种关系提供适当的理论。尤其是,每个对象都犯了原型错误,并且这样做的原因过于狭analytical和分析性强,概念规范过于含糊或过于简化。每个人都宣称自己对于把握社会关系的空间方面是唯一有效的;因此,每个人都犯了过分“中间派”的错误(例如,“以地方为中心”,“以网络为中心”等)。在进行与哲学解构平行的批判的过程中,作者证明了这种中心主义的盲目性和不足之处,因而未能给出空间社会关系所要求的“厚实的描述”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号