...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Making kinship with human remains: Repatriation, biomedicine and the many relations of Charles Byrne
【24h】

Making kinship with human remains: Repatriation, biomedicine and the many relations of Charles Byrne

机译:与人类遗骸建立亲属关系:遣返,生物医学和查尔斯·伯恩的许多关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper explores the ways in which genealogical, ancestral and wider forms of relatedness are produced through human remains. It does so through focusing on the case of the controversial display of the remains of Charles Byrne (1761–83), commonly known as ‘The Irish Giant’ in the Hunterian Museum in London. These remains have been mobilised in the making of ideas of national, regional and local belonging for the remains themselves and differently imagined geographies of relatedness and collective identity. They have also been subject to biomedical research that has involved producing ideas of genetic relatedness that have been used in debates over the most appropriate place for the remains. The making of kinship to and through human remains can involve a range of social actors and institutions with distinct and overlapping interests and intentions, personal, collective, clinical, historical, scientific, the entanglement of discourses of memory, local history, biomedicine and genomics, and national, regional, local and also diasporic geographies of collective identity and experience. Ideas of kinship and shared ancestry continue to be potent models of relatedness and belonging at different scales.
机译:本文探讨了通过人类遗骸产生谱系,祖先和更广泛形式的亲缘关系的方式。它通过关注有争议的查尔斯·伯恩(1761-83)遗骸的陈列来做到这一点,查尔斯·伯恩(1761-83)在伦敦的亨特利博物馆中通常被称为“爱尔兰巨人”。这些遗骸已被动员起来,为遗骸本身以及与民族和集体身份有关的不同想象的地理位置,提出了国家,地区和地方归属的思想。他们还受到生物医学研究的影响,涉及产生遗传相关性的想法,这些想法已在关于最合适的遗体场所的辩论中使用。与人类遗骸建立亲属关系可能涉及一系列具有不同的利益和意图,个人,集体,临床,历史,科学,纠缠的记忆,当地历史,生物医学和基因组学的社会行为者和机构,以及具有集体身份和经验的国家,地区,地方以及海外地理环境。亲属关系和共同血统的思想仍然是有效的联系性和归属感的典范。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号