首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >High Court Urged To Detail Industry Flexibility To Challenge Rules
【24h】

High Court Urged To Detail Industry Flexibility To Challenge Rules

机译:高等法院敦促详细说明行业应对挑战规则的灵活性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A coalition of industry groups is backing government arguments to the Supreme Court that regulated industries may more easily bring facial challenges to EPA and other agency rulemakings than environmentalists and other third parties,although the coalition in a recent brief urges the court to provide clear guidance on the issue. Among the issues in the case,Priscilla Summers,et al.v.Earth Island Institute,et al.,is when parties may file suit challenging a regulation on its face.The case also involves questions over environmentalists' standing to challenge federal regulations and whether a district court can issue a national injunction against implementing a regulation.The Supreme Court's ruling could set a precedent on all these issues under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) that would broadly apply to challenges of environmental regulations.
机译:一个工业团体联盟正在支持政府向最高法院提出的论点,即与环保主义者和其他第三方相比,受监管的行业可能比环保主义者和其他第三方更容易给EPA和其他机构法规制定带来面部挑战。问题。在此案的问题中,普里西拉·萨默斯(Priscilla Summers)等人诉地球岛研究所等人是当事方可能提起诉讼质疑其表面的法规。该案还涉及环保主义者质疑联邦法规和法律的立场的问题。最高法院的裁决可以为《行政诉讼法》(APA)下的所有这些问题树立先例,该法律将广泛适用于环境法规的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号