首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >After Doj Admits Error,activists Ask High Court To Reverse Nsr Ruling
【24h】

After Doj Admits Error,activists Ask High Court To Reverse Nsr Ruling

机译:司法部承认错误后,维权人士要求高等法院撤销Nsr裁决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Environmentalists are asking the Supreme Court to bypass oral argument in a key new source review (NSR) case they have asked the court to review,instead asking justices to immediately find for them on the merits and reverse a lower court's ruling after the Department of Justice (DOJ) admitted the decision in its favor was in error. If environmentalists prevail in National Parks Conservation Association [NPCAJ,et al.v.Tennessee Valley Authority [TVA],it would allow them to file citizen suits to force facilities to install pollution controls triggered by past modifications even after a five-year statute of limitations expires.NPCA and EPA have long taken the position that the statute of limitations does not apply to illegal facility modifications because the modification creates an "ongoing" violation in the form of excess emissions.
机译:环保主义者要求最高法院在他们要求法院进行审查的关键新来源审查(NSR)案件中绕过口头辩论,而不是要求法官立即根据案情寻找他们,并在司法部后撤销下级法院的裁决。 (DOJ)承认对它有利的决定是错误的。如果环保主义者在国家公园保护协会[NPCAJ,et al.v.Tennessee Valley Authority [TVA]]中占上风,它将允许他们提起公民诉讼,迫使设施安装由过去的修改触发的污染控制措施,即使该法规已颁布5年。限制到期。NPCA和EPA长期以来一直认为限制法规不适用于非法设施修改,因为修改会以过量排放的形式造成“持续的”违规行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号