...
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >GAO REPORT FUELS ONGOING DISPUTE OVER SUPERFUND FUNDING LEVELS
【24h】

GAO REPORT FUELS ONGOING DISPUTE OVER SUPERFUND FUNDING LEVELS

机译:GAO报告溢价持续在超募资金水平上引起争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

With EPA conceding its Superfund cleanup cost recovery options are limited in part due to recent Supreme Court rulings, a just-released report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) finds that EPA does not provide Congress with sufficient data for lawmakers to make adequate funding decisions, prompting some Republicans to argue that the Superfund program does not need additional money.rnThe Aug. 14 report, Litigation Has Decreased and EPA Needs Better Information on Site Cleanup and Cost Issues to Estimate Future Program Funding Requirements, was requested by Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) and other GOP lawmakers. GAO says EPA should develop better data when seeking congressional approval for Superfund funding, prompting those lawmakers to also resist a bid to reinstate the long-expired Superfund tax on industry. The report is available on InsideEPA.com. See page 2 for details.rnEnvironmentalists however are questioning the Republicans' interpretation of the report. There is a "big difference [between] saying EPA doesn't manage the funding it receives versus it not effectively quantifying what it needs. That seems like two really different things," one environmentalist says.
机译:由于EPA承认其超级基金清理成本的选择部分受到最高法院最近裁定的限制,政府问责局(GAO)刚刚发布的报告发现EPA没有向国会提供足够的数据供国会议员做出足够的资金决策。 ,促使一些共和党人争辩说超级基金计划不需要额外的资金。8月14日的报告“诉讼减少了,EPA需要更好的场地清理和成本问题信息来估计未来计划的资金需求”,参议员James Inhofe要求。 (R-OK)和其他共和党议员。 GAO表示,EPA在寻求国会批准超级基金资金时应开发更好的数据,促使那些立法者也拒绝恢复长期以来对行业征收的超级基金税的提议。该报告可在InsideEPA.com上找到。有关详细信息,请参见第2页。rn然而,环保主义者质疑共和党对报告的解释。一位环保主义者说:“之间的巨大区别是,美国环保署无法管理收到的资金与无法有效地量化所需的资金。这似乎是两件截然不同的事情。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号