首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Activists Fault Wetlands Guide Despite Epa Adoption Of Key Principles
【24h】

Activists Fault Wetlands Guide Despite Epa Adoption Of Key Principles

机译:尽管依法采用了关键原则,但维权人士断层湿地指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Environmentalists are publicly criticizing a recently revised EPA-Army Corps guidance for determining whether isolated wetlands and other marginal waters are subject to the Clean Water Act (CWA), even though the guidance expands oversight of the waters consistent with activists' recent recommendations. One EPA source says environmentalists are not willing to praise the guidance publicly because they fear it may undermine their arguments to Congress to quickly pass legislation addressing the issue. Activists "indicated privately that the guidance was actually very good... but no one was willing to say that publicly because it would undermine efforts to move legislation," the source says. An environmentalist says EPA's adoption of the legal principles is "very helpful" but that limits in the guidance "make you wonder how far you can really go" in asserting jurisdiction over marginal waters. Despite their disagreements, the EPA source and environmentalists agree that it is difficult for EPA to resolve the issue under its existing authority and is best for Congress to act.
机译:环保主义者公开批评最近修订的EPA-Army Corps指南,以确定孤立的湿地和其他边缘水域是否受《清洁水法》(CWA)的约束,即使该指南扩大了对水体的监督,并符合激进主义者的最新建议。一位美国环保署消息人士说,环保主义者不愿意公开赞扬该指导方针,因为他们担心该指导方针会破坏他们向国会迅速通过解决该问题的立法的论点。消息人士说,激进分子“私下表示该指导实际上是非常好的……但没人愿意公开说这,因为这会破坏推动立法的努力。”一位环保主义者说,EPA采纳法律原则“非常有帮助”,但该准则的局限性“使您想知道您能真正走多远”以主张对边缘水域的管辖权。尽管存在分歧,但EPA消息人士和环保人士一致认为,EPA很难在其现有授权下解决该问题,而国会最好采取行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号