首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Stormwater Ruling Suggests Superfund 'Arranger' Liability Still Broad
【24h】

Stormwater Ruling Suggests Superfund 'Arranger' Liability Still Broad

机译:暴雨裁定显示超级基金“ Arranger”责任仍很广泛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A recent federal court ruling finding the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) potentially liable under the Superfund law for highway stormwater runoff demonstrates that some courts are still applying "arranger" liability broadly despite a Supreme Court decision that appeared to limit its reach, lawyers say.rnIn the June 7 ruling in the case United States v. WSDOT, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington held the state department potentially liable as an arranger of hazardous waste disposal under Superfund because it designed a highway stormwater runoff system that contributed to the contamination of local waterbodies.
机译:联邦法院最近的一项裁决发现,华盛顿州交通运输部(WSDOT)根据超级基金法可能对高速公路雨水径流负有责任,这表明尽管最高法院的一项决定似乎限制了其范围,但一些法院仍在广泛地运用“安排人”责任,律师在6月7日关于“美国诉WSDOT”一案的裁决中,华盛顿西区美国地方法院裁定,国务院在超级基金会的资助下有可能作为危险废物处置的安排人,因为它设计了一种公路雨水径流系统,导致当地水体受到污染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号