首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Industry Rejects Suit Seeking CAFO Liability For Contractor's Discharges
【24h】

Industry Rejects Suit Seeking CAFO Liability For Contractor's Discharges

机译:业界拒绝提起诉讼,要求CAFO承担承包商的责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A major poultry company is pushing a federal district court to dismiss a novel case where environmentalists are seeking to hold large livestock "integrators" liable for violations of their contractors' Clean Water Act (CWA) discharge permits, arguing that its contractual relationship with a farm is not enough to make it a defendant under the water act. Environmentalists hope the lawsuit, Assateague Coastkeeper, et al. v. Alan & Kristin Hudson Farm, et al., could lead EPA and states to hold large farming companies responsible for the waste at smaller contract farms-something industry has long resisted, saying that integrators have no control over the daily work of such farms, and consequently their waste streams. Most commercial poultry raised in the United States is done by family farms under contract to large agriculture companies, who are known as integrators.
机译:一家大型的家禽公司正在敦促联邦地方法院驳回一个新的案件,环保主义者试图追究大型牲畜“集成商”,因为他们违反了承包商的《清洁水法》(CWA)排放许可证,并辩称其与农场的合同关系不足以使其成为水法下的被告。环保主义者希望诉讼,Assateague Coastkeeper等。诉Alan&Kristin Hudson Farm等人的案子可能会导致EPA导致州和州让大型农业公司对小型合同农场的废物负责,这是业界长期以来一直抵制的观点,他说集成商无法控制此类农场的日常工作,因此产生了废物流。在美国,大多数商业家禽都是由家庭农场生产的,这些家庭农场是与大型农业公司签订合同的,而大型农业公司被称为集成商。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号