首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Despite Neutral Proposal, EPA Seen Preferring Hazardous Coal Ash Rules
【24h】

Despite Neutral Proposal, EPA Seen Preferring Hazardous Coal Ash Rules

机译:尽管有中性建议,但美国环保署仍认为有害粉煤灰规定更为可取

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

EPA in its just-released proposal for first-time Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA) coal ash rules appears to prefer and lay the groundwork for hazardous waste rules by including cost-benefit estimates and other data bolstering the strict approach, in contrast to EPA's other option of regulating coal ash less strictly as solid waste.rnFurther, EPA officials on a May 4 press conference call announcing the new proposal defended a RCRA hazardous subtitle C regulatory option from industry criticisms that it would decimate industries that beneficially reuse ash in products such as cement. The officials also noted that under a RCRA subtitle D solid waste approach, EPA would lack federal enforcement authority for coal ash controls - a concern raised by activists who favor subtitle C.
机译:EPA在其首次发布的《第一次资源保护和回收法》(RCRA)煤灰规则提案中似乎更喜欢并为危险废物规则奠定基础,因为它包括成本效益估算和其他支持严格方法的数据,与之相反EPA的另一种选择是不严格控制作为固体废物的煤灰。rn此外,EPA官员在5月4日的新闻发布会上宣布该新提案为RCRA危险副标题C监管选择辩护,因为该批评将淘汰有利于产品中再利用灰分的行业例如水泥。官员们还指出,按照RCRA副标题D固体废物处理法,EPA将缺乏联邦政府对粉煤灰控制的执法权-支持副标题C的活动人士对此表示关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号