首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Industry Cites Lack Of NAS Study As Key Concern With 10X Risk Approach
【24h】

Industry Cites Lack Of NAS Study As Key Concern With 10X Risk Approach

机译:业界称缺乏NAS研究是10倍风险法的关键问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Industry groups are raising concerns that EPA's proposed strict approach for applying a ten-fold (10X) safety factor in pesticide risk assessments does not take into account a key National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report on risk reviews that may provide vital suggestions for ensuring the 10X approach is based on best available science.rnThe groups - including CropLife America and the American Chemistry Council - also asked for an extension of time to comment on EPA's proposed policy paper "Revised Risk Assessment Methods for Workers in Agricultural Fields, and Pesticides With No Food Uses." The paper lays out how EPA intends to revise risk assessments for pesticide uses and exposures that are not governed by the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act.
机译:行业团体越来越担心,EPA提议的在农药风险评估中应用十倍(10X)安全系数的严格方法没有考虑到美国国家科学院(NAS)关于风险评估的关键报告,该报告可能为确保安全性提供重要建议。 10X方法基于最佳科学方法。rn包括CropLife America和American Chemistry Council在内的小组也要求延长时间,以评论EPA的政策文件“农业领域工人的修订风险评估方法,以及使用没有食物用途。”该文件列出了EPA打算如何修改不受《联邦食品,药物和化妆品法》管辖的农药使用和暴露的风险评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号