首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Appeals Court Restores Scaled-Back Economic Test For Wetland Permits
【24h】

Appeals Court Restores Scaled-Back Economic Test For Wetland Permits

机译:上诉法院恢复对湿地许可证的按比例缩减的经济测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A federal appeals court has overturned a precedent-setting lower court ruling that had raised the bar for what project costs the Army Corps of Engineers can consider when granting wetland fill permits under the Clean Water Act, but the court also opened the door to requiring the Corps to vigorously weigh permits' impacts to endangered species' habitat. "I would say the district court opinion sent a strong pro-wetland precedent, and unfortunately that has been dis pensed with, so on some level we're returning to the status quo," says an environmentalist involved with the suit. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Nov. 29 ruled in Sierra Club et al. v. Robert Van Antwerp, et al to overturn a lower court decision from 2010 that found the Corps may not take a developer's ability to profit from a development as a primary consideration of whether to approve a CWA section 404 dredge-and-fill permit. The ruling is available on InsideEpa.com. SeEpage 2 for details.
机译:联邦上诉法院推翻了下级法院的一项先例裁决,该裁决提高了陆军工程兵团根据《清洁水法》授予湿地填充许可证时可以考虑的项目成本的门槛,但是法院也为要求该项目开了大门。军团要大力权衡许可证对濒临灭绝物种的栖息地的影响。 “我想说地方法院的意见发出了一个强有力的支持湿地的先例,但是不幸的是,这已经被忽略了,所以从某种程度上说,我们正在恢复现状,”参与诉讼的环保主义者说。美国哥伦比亚地区巡回上诉法院于11月29日在Sierra Club等人的案中作出裁决。诉罗伯特·范·安特卫普(Robert Van Antwerp)等人推翻了2010年的一项较低的法院裁决,该裁决认为该军团可能不以开发商从开发中获利的能力作为是否批准CWA第404条“挖泥和填土”许可的主要考虑因素。该裁决可在InsideEpa.com上找到。请参见第2页。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号