...
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Industry Criticizes EPA Plan For Determining Health Risk In Ozone Review
【24h】

Industry Criticizes EPA Plan For Determining Health Risk In Ozone Review

机译:业界批评EPA计划确定臭氧审查中的健康风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An industry-sponsored consultant is criticizing EPA's plan for considering human health risk and exposure studies in its ongoing review of the agency's ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS), questioning EPA's assessment of the pollutant's effect on the lungs and saying the agency is ignoring key data uncertainties and limitations. The criticism comes as the agency's science advisers are separately seeking clarity from EPA on how it intends to consider policy-relevant background (PRB) ozone levels in the five-year review of the ozone standard, which is required under the Clean Air Act. Nothing states do in terms of imposing new pollution controls will achieve any reduction in naturally occurring PRB levels, which could make it impossible to attain a stricter NAAQS, sources say.
机译:一位行业赞助的顾问在批评环保署的臭氧国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS)的过程中,批评了环保署考虑人类健康风险和暴露研究的计划,质疑环保署对污染物对肺部影响的评估,并表示环保署无视该计划。关键数据的不确定性和局限性。受到批评之际,环保局的科学顾问正在分别寻求美国环保署(EPA)的澄清,以期在《清洁空气法》要求对臭氧标准进行为期五年的审查中,如何考虑与政策相关的背景(PRB)臭氧水平。消息人士称,在实施新的污染控制措施方面,任何州都不会实现自然降低PRB水平的任何降低,这可能使获得更严格的NAAQS成为不可能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号