首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >High Court Raises Bar For Criminal Penalties In Environmental Cases
【24h】

High Court Raises Bar For Criminal Penalties In Environmental Cases

机译:高等法院提高环境案件的刑事处罚标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Supreme Court has ruled that juries, not judges, must set limits for criminal penalties in cases brought under the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA), setting a higher bar for EPA as it seeks to enforce fines on polluting companies under a host of environmental laws. In a 6-3 decision in the case, Southern Union Company v. USA, the justices agreed with the company, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and defense lawyers that a prior court precedent requiring prosecutors to obtain jury rulings when seeking enhanced sentencing should also apply to criminal penalties.
机译:最高法院裁定,对于根据《资源保护与恢复法》(RCRA)提起的案件,陪审团(而非法官)必须为刑事处罚设定限制,为EPA寻求更高的罚款标准,因为它试图对一系列污染源的公司实施罚款。环境法。在该案中,Southern Union Company诉USA以6-3的裁决,法官与该公司,美国商会和辩护律师达成了一致,也应适用先前要求检察官在寻求增强量刑时获得陪审团裁决的法院先例。刑事处罚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号