...
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Appellate Court Poised To Rule On Novel Superfund Enforcement Approach
【24h】

Appellate Court Poised To Rule On Novel Superfund Enforcement Approach

机译:上诉法院准备裁定新颖的超级基金执行方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An upcoming ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit has the potential to change the way EPA ensures Superfund sites are cleaned up by making it easier for the agency to hold multiple potentially responsible parties (PRPs) responsible for the remediation work, attorneys following the case say. At issue in United States v. Glatfelter, which involves the cleanup of contaminated sediment in Wisconsin's Lower Fox River, is whether EPA can obtain a permanent injunction under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation & Liability Act (CERCLA) to enforce a unilateral administrative order (UAO), especially when there is no allegation that a PRP has violated the UAO or before cleanup obligations are delineated. The permanent injunction requires a multitude of PRPs at the site to comply with the UAO, even though one of the PRPs has already committed to perform the cleanup.
机译:美国第七巡回上诉法院即将出台的裁决有可能改变EPA确保Superfund网站被清理的方式,方法是使该机构更容易安排负责补救工作的多个潜在责任方(PRP),律师根据情况说。在美国诉Glatfelter案中,涉及清理威斯康星州下福克斯河中受污染沉积物的争议是EPA是否可以根据《全面环境响应,赔偿与责任法》(CERCLA)获得永久禁令以执行单方面行政命令( UAO),尤其是当没有指控PRP违反UAO或在划定清理义务之前。即使其中一个PRP已经承诺执行清理工作,该永久性禁令仍需要在现场使用大量PRP才能符合UAO。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号