首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >EPA Touts Discretion To Prioritize Rules In Defending Mine NSPS Petition
【24h】

EPA Touts Discretion To Prioritize Rules In Defending Mine NSPS Petition

机译:EPA禁止在保护矿山NSPS申请中优先考虑规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

EPA is touting its Clean Air Act discretion to prioritize rules in urging an appellate court to reject environmentalists' lawsuit over the agency's decision to reject their petition seeking first-time controls on coal mines' emissions of methane, saying nothing in the air law mandates EPA to move advocates' preferred policies "to the head of the queue." In a Dec. 24 brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, EPA also reiterates past defenses of its decision to reject the petition, including that at a time of reduced budgets it lacks the resources to pursue the discretionary rulemaking; that it needs to first finalize other higher-priority rules; and that it must prioritize its response to court-ordered deadlines and non-discretionary statutory deadlines for other policies.
机译:EPA正在吹嘘其《清洁空气法》的酌处权,以优先考虑规则,敦促上诉法院拒绝环境保护者的诉讼,而不是该机构拒绝他们寻求首次控制煤矿甲烷排放的请愿书的决定。将倡导者的偏爱政策“排在首位”。在12月24日提交给美国上诉法院的哥伦比亚特区巡回法院的摘要中,EPA还重申了其拒绝该请愿书的决定的过往辩护,包括在预算减少的情况下,EPA缺乏进行自由裁量性规则制定的资源。 ;它需要首先敲定其他更高优先级的规则;并且必须优先考虑对法院规定的其他政策期限和非强制性法定期限的回应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号