首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Industry Says Flaws In EPA 'Waters' Rule Ensure Return To Supreme Court
【24h】

Industry Says Flaws In EPA 'Waters' Rule Ensure Return To Supreme Court

机译:业内人士说,EPA“水域”规定存在缺陷,以确保重返最高法院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Industry officials say EPA's final Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction rule fails to achieve its goal of providing regulatory certainty on the law's reach and contains a host of other flaws, which the sources say ensures litigation that will result in the Supreme Court again having to weigh in on the years-long fight over the law's scope. "This is going to end up in the Supreme Court," says one industry source, even though the last time the justices took up CWA jurisdiction it led to two competing tests for determining the law's scope that EPA's final rule is meant to resolve. Fights over the law's scope could remain unresolved for years, the source says, given the time taken for litigation and the fact that the membership of the Supreme Court several years from now is unpredictable.
机译:行业官员表示,EPA的最终《清洁水法》(CWA)管辖权规则未能实现其在法律范围内提供监管确定性的目标,并且还存在许多其他缺陷,消息人士称,这些缺陷可确保诉讼,这将导致最高法院再次提起诉讼。参与长达数年的法律范围斗争。一位业内消息人士说:“这将最终在最高法院审理。”尽管最后一次大法官获得了CWA管辖权,但它还是引发了两项竞争性测试,以确定EPA最终规则旨在解决的法律范围。消息人士称,考虑到诉讼时间以及几年后最高法院成员的身份是不可预测的,有关法律范围的争执可能多年仍未解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号