首页> 外文期刊>Entsorga Magazin >Environmentalists, EPA At Odds Over Use Of Low-Priority TSCA Reviews
【24h】

Environmentalists, EPA At Odds Over Use Of Low-Priority TSCA Reviews

机译:环保主义者,EPA对使用低优先级TSCA的评论感到奇怪

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmentalists are urging EPA to aggressively use its data collection power in the revised toxics law for its plan to prioritize existing chemicals for review and limit designations of substances as low priorities for review, but the agency says data collection is time-consuming and that low-priority findings can help conserve limited resources. EPA on Dec. 11 held a public meeting in Washington, D.C., to hear input on potential approaches for pre-prioritization of chemicals for review under the recently revised Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The Obama EPA in January proposed a pre-prioritization process for existing chemicals, but the Trump EPA removed that process from the final rule issued in June, saying it needed more public input. During the meeting, officials with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), and Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families urged EPA staff to use new authority under TSCA to collect data on chemicals that may be prioritized for review, and said that designating a broad array of chemicals as low priority for review would be contrary to the law's intent.
机译:环保主义者敦促EPA在其修订后的《有毒物质法》中积极使用其数据收集权,以使其计划优先考虑现有化学品并限制将物质指定为低优先级审查对象,但环保署表示,数据收集非常耗时,而且优先发现可以帮助节省有限的资源。 EPA于12月11日在华盛顿特区举行了一次公开会议,听取了有关根据最近修订的《有毒物质控制法案》(TSCA)进行化学物质优先排序的潜在方法的意见。 1月的奥巴马EPA提议对现有化学品进行优先排序,但特朗普EPA从6月发布的最终规则中删除了该过程,称需要更多的公众投入。在会议期间,环境保护基金(EDF)和安全化学品,健康家庭组织的官员敦促EPA工作人员使用TSCA的新授权来收集有关化学品的数据,这些数据可能需要优先审查,并表示要指定多种化学品因为低优先级的审查将违背法律的意图。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Entsorga Magazin》 |2017年第26期|21-22|共2页
  • 作者

    Dave Reynolds;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号