...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering >A Comparative Study of Majority/Minority Logic Circuit Synthesis Methods for Post-CMOS Nanotechnologies
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Majority/Minority Logic Circuit Synthesis Methods for Post-CMOS Nanotechnologies

机译:后CMOS纳米技术多数/少数逻辑电路合成方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The physical limitations of complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology have led many researchers to consider other alternative technologies. Quantum-dot cellular automate (QCA), single electron tunneling (SET), tunneling phase logic (TPL), spintronic devices, etc., are some of the nanotechnologies that are being considered as possible replacements for CMOS. In these nanotechnologies, the basic logic units used to implement circuits are majority and/or minority gates. Several majority/minority logic circuit synthesis methods have been proposed. In this paper, we give a comparative study of the existing majority/minority logic circuit synthesis methods that are capable of synthesizing multi-input multi-output Boolean functions. Each of these methods is discussed in detail. The optimization priorities given to different factors such as gates, levels, inverters, etc., vary with technologies. Based on these optimization factors, the results obtained from different synthesis methods are compared. The paper also analyzes the optimization capabilities of different methods and discusses directions for future research in the synthesis of majority/minority logic networks.
机译:互补金属氧化物半导体(CMOS)技术的物理局限性促使许多研究人员考虑其他替代技术。量子点蜂窝自动(QCA),单电子隧穿(SET),隧穿相位逻辑(TPL),自旋电子器件等是被认为可以替代CMOS的一些纳米技术。在这些纳米技术中,用于实现电路的基本逻辑单元是多数和/或少数门。已经提出了几种多数/少数逻辑电路综合方法。在本文中,我们对能够合成多输入多输出布尔函数的现有多数/少数逻辑电路合成方法进行了比较研究。将详细讨论这些方法中的每一种。赋予不同因素(如门,电平,逆变器等)的优化优先级随技术而变化。基于这些优化因素,比较了从不同合成方法获得的结果。本文还分析了不同方法的优化能力,并讨论了未来多数/少数逻辑网络综合研究的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号