首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Structural analysis of non-prismatic beams: Critical issues, accurate stress recovery, and analytical definition of the Finite Element (FE) stiffness matrix
【24h】

Structural analysis of non-prismatic beams: Critical issues, accurate stress recovery, and analytical definition of the Finite Element (FE) stiffness matrix

机译:非棱镜梁的结构分析:有限元(Fe)刚度矩阵的关键问题,准确应力恢复和分析定义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Non-prismatic beams are widely employed in strategic structures like bridges and sport arenas, requiring accurate analyses for a reliable and effective design. Unfortunately, features of non-prismatic beams lead their modeling to be a non-trivial task: (i) variations of both cross-section area and second moment of area impede an easy computation of analytical solutions compelling to use approximated methods; (ii) stress distributions in prismatic and non-prismatic beams are substantially different, as proved by analytical results available since the beginning of the past century; and (iii) the peculiar stress distribution in non-prismatic beams entails complicated constitutive relations, as highlighted in recent publications. Usually, commercial software does not properly account for all the features of non-prismatic beams, leading to inconsistent structural analyses, erroneous estimations of the stress distribution, and -consequently- coarse predictions of the structural element strength. The present paper proposes a strategy to effectively overcome the above-mentioned problems. We derive an accurate analytical model for 2D non-prismatic beams, able to handle the non-trivial stress distribution and the complicated constitutive relations. Thereafter, we compute both homogeneous and particular solutions using the symbolic calculus software MAPLE and we analytically define the Finite Element (FE) stiffness matrix for a planar, symmetric, linearly-tapered beam. Finally, we compare the proposed FE and SAP2000 solutions, considering several beams with different geometries, loads, and constraints. Numerical results highlight the reliability of the proposed modeling strategy, since the resulting FE consistently handles all the critical issues of non-prismatic beams with an extremely low computational cost. Conversely, SAP2000 solution remarks the need of ad hoc analysis tools and modeling strategies to be used for the design of non-prismatic structural elements.
机译:非棱柱形光束广泛用于桥梁和运动竞技场的战略结构中,需要准确地分析可靠且有效的设计。遗憾的是,非棱镜光束的特征引入了它们的建模,成为一个非平凡的任务:(i)横截面区域和第二矩的变化阻碍了对使用近似方法的分析解决方案的简便计算; (ii)棱柱形和非棱镜梁中的应力分布基本上不同,因为自过去的世纪初以来通过分析结果证明; (iii)在最近出版物中突出显示,非棱镜梁中的特殊应力分布需要复杂的本构型关系。通常,商业软件不正确地考虑非棱镜光束的所有特征,导致结构分析不一致,应力分布的错误估计,以及对结构元件强度的应激粗略预测。本文提出了一种有效克服上述问题的策略。我们推导了2D非棱镜光束的准确分析模型,能够处理非琐碎的应力分布和复杂的本构关系。此后,我们使用符号微积分软件枫木计算均匀和特定的解决方案,我们分析了用于平面,对称的线性锥形梁的有限元(Fe)刚度矩阵。最后,我们将建议的FE和SAP2000解决方案进行比较,考虑有几个具有不同几何形状,负载和约束的梁。数值结果突出了所提出的建模策略的可靠性,因为所得FE始终如例以极低的计算成本处理非棱镜光束的所有关键问题。相反,SAP2000解决方案谨然需要临时分析工具和建模策略,用于设计非棱柱形结构元素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号