首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Thermoeconomics, cost benefit analysis, and a novel way of dealing with revenue generating dissipative units applied to candidate decentralised energy systems for Indian rural villages
【24h】

Thermoeconomics, cost benefit analysis, and a novel way of dealing with revenue generating dissipative units applied to candidate decentralised energy systems for Indian rural villages

机译:热经济学,成本收益分析,以及一种新颖的处理创收性耗散单位的方法,该方法已应用于印度乡村的候选分散式能源系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Attractive economic performance of energy systems is important for their long term sustainability. In this paper, a cost benefit analysis (CBA), standard thermoeconomic analysis, and a new method that combines the two was applied to seven modelled candidate decentralised energy systems for small Indian rural villages. By including elements of CBA in standard thermoeconomics, economic inefficiencies at the component level and revenue adjusted costs of exergy for each stream were ascertained. The analysed systems all produced household and irrigation electricity as well as a secondary product or service, which in some cases utilised waste heat from the electricity generation process. The system that produced distilled water as a secondary product was the most economically sustainable out of those modelled. While the standard thermoeconomic electricity cost remained around 0.5 USD/kWh for all analysed systems, the benefit to cost ratios varied from 0.29 to 0.97, demonstrating differing appeal to outside investment. By incorporating CBA into standard thermoeconomics the accounted revenue produced a larger spread in exergetic costs than standard thermoeconomics (for example, an electricity cost range of 0.217-0.507 USD/kWh), thus providing a better comparison of systems with different energy end uses.
机译:能源系统具有吸引力的经济表现对其长期可持续性至关重要。在本文中,将成本效益分析(CBA),标准热经济分析以及结合两者的新方法应用于印度小乡村的七个建模的候选分散式能源系统。通过将CBA的元素包括在标准热经济学中,可以确定组件水平的经济效率低下,并确定了每条物流的经调整的火用成本。所分析的系统都产生了家庭和灌溉用电以及次级产品或服务,在某些情况下,它们利用了发电过程中的废热。在建模的系统中,以蒸馏水为副产品的系统在经济上最可持续。虽然所有分析系统的标准热经济电成本保持在0.5美元/千瓦时左右,但成本效益比从0.29到0.97不等,这表明对外部投资的吸引力有所不同。通过将CBA纳入标准热经济学中,与标准热经济学相比,会计收入产生的高能成本差异更大(例如,电成本范围为0.217-0.507 USD / kWh),从而可以更好地比较具有不同能源最终用途的系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号