首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Thermoeconomic assessment of a micro cogeneration system with LNG cold utilization
【24h】

Thermoeconomic assessment of a micro cogeneration system with LNG cold utilization

机译:LNG冷利用的微型热电联产系统的热经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Few studies have been reported for the small scale LNG regasification units in power generation systems although many applied LNG cold utilization systems exist for the large scale regasification plants. Impact of the LNG cold utilization system is investigated for the micro cogeneration systems thermoeconomically. An exergy-cost matrix is generated for the systems, which then compared to the conventional micro cogeneration systems. Ambient air temperature and compressor pressure ratio are analyzed. The required work for the LNG pump is found to be neglected in overall cycle analyses. In the cogeneration case, the exergetic and energetic efficiencies are roundly two and three times higher than the single power generation case. The exergoeconomic factor is roundly 26.8% less in the LNG cold utilized system while the relative cost is 75% higher in the conventional case. The LNG cold utilization increases the levelized product costs about 1.7 times at the pressure ratio of 3.64. A graphic-based single objective optimization is conducted by determining unit product cost and exergetic efficiency as the objectives. The maximum relative unit product cost difference is found at 308.15 K while the minimum relative exergetic efficiency difference is at 288.15 K. We suggest system improvements through the thermoeconomic evaluation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管在大规模再气化工厂中存在许多应用的LNG冷利用系统,但对于发电系统中的小规模LNG再气化装置的报道很少。从热经济学角度研究了液化天然气冷利用系统对微型热电联产系统的影响。为系统生成一个火用成本矩阵,然后将其与常规的微型热电联产系统进行比较。分析环境温度和压缩机压力比。 LNG泵所需的工作在整个周期分析中被忽略了。在热电联产的情况下,高能效和高能效大约是单发电量的两倍和三倍。在液化天然气冷利用系统中,能效经济因素少了约26.8%,而在传统情况下,相对成本要高出75%。在压力比为3.64时,液化天然气的冷利用率使平整产品成本增加了约1.7倍。通过确定单位产品成本和积极效率为目标,进行基于图形的单一目标优化。发现最大相对单位产品成本差异为308.15 K,而最小相对能效差异为288.15K。我们建议通过热经济评估来改进系统。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy》 |2017年第15期|171-184|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Nanyang Technol Univ, Energy Res Inst NTU, Interdisciplinary Grad Sch, Singapore 637141, Singapore|Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore;

    Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Phys & Math Sci, Singapore 637371, Singapore;

    Nanyang Technol Univ, Energy Res Inst NTU, Interdisciplinary Grad Sch, Singapore 637141, Singapore;

    Nanyang Technol Univ, Energy Res Inst NTU, Interdisciplinary Grad Sch, Singapore 637141, Singapore;

    Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Thermoeconomic analysis; Exergy analysis; Combined heat and power; Power generation; Gas turbine; Exergy costing;

    机译:热经济分析;火用分析;热电联产;发电;燃气轮机;火用成本;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号