...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy >A hybrid compressed natural gas-pneumatic system as a powering option for buses: A comparative assessment
【24h】

A hybrid compressed natural gas-pneumatic system as a powering option for buses: A comparative assessment

机译:一个混合压缩天然气气动系统,作为公共汽车的动力选择:比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In response to environmental, energy, and efficiency problems of conventional vehicles, research and innovation on potential electrical, hydrogen, pneumatic, and hybrid solutions have recently been carried out by numerous researchers. The current study develops and evaluates a hybrid type compressed natural gas (CNG)-pneumatic powertrain concept for common buses to provide a cleaner solution for public transportation. In terms of tank-to-wheel efficiency, well-to-wheel efficiency, energy consumption, carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, capital cost and driving range, the proposed system is comparatively evaluated with various powering options. The buses considered in the study are named based on powering fuel type: diesel, compressed natural gas (CNG), electricity, hybrid diesel-electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid CNG-pneumatic. Moreover, an operational reliability concept is developed as an additional assessment criterion to define the most reliable powering choice. The operating conditions and related parameters of the proposed concept are given, and the obtained performance values of the concept are discussed through the comparative assessment study. The current results show that the hybrid CNG-pneumatic bus emits 0.80 kg CO2 per km, making it the second nature-friendly option after the hydrogen fuel cell bus (0.312 kg CO2/km). Furthermore, in terms of operational reliability, the results reveal that the hybrid CNG-pneumatic bus is the most reliable option, with values of up to 66% amongst the evaluated options. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:响应于常规车辆的环境,能源和效率问题,最近通过多种研究人员进行了常规车辆的研究和创新,潜在的电气,氢气,气动和混合溶液。目前的研究开发和评估了用于共同公共汽车的混合型压缩天然气(CNG)-Pneumic动力总成概念,为公共交通提供清洁的解决方案。就罐头轮效率而言,井轮效率,能耗,二氧化碳(CO2)发射,资本成本和驾驶范围,所提出的系统采用各种通电选项进行比较评价。该研究中考虑的公共汽车基于电力燃料类型:柴油,压缩天然气(CNG),电力,杂交柴油 - 电动,氢燃料电池和杂交CNG-气动。此外,操作可靠性概念被开发为额外的评估标准,以定义最可靠的供电选择。给出了所提出的概念的操作条件和相关参数,通过比较评估研究讨论了所获得的概念的性能值。目前的结果表明,混合CNG气动总线每公里发出0.80公斤CO2,使其在氢气燃料电池总线(0.312kg CO2 / km)之后的第二种自然友好选择。此外,在操作可靠性方面,结果表明,混合CNG-气动总线是最可靠的选项,在评估选项中的值高达66%。 (c)2021 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号