首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Techno-economic and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment of liquefied natural gas supply chain in China
【24h】

Techno-economic and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment of liquefied natural gas supply chain in China

机译:技术经济和生命周期温室气体排放评估液化天然气供应链中国

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study assessed the techno-economic performance and life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for various liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply chains in China in order to find the most efficient way to supply and use LNG. This study improves current literature by adding supply chain optimization options (cold energy recovery and hydrogen production) and by analyzing the entire supply chain of four different LNG end-users (power generation, industrial heating, residential heating, and truck usage). This resulted in 33 LNG pathways for which the energy efficiency, life cycle GHG emissions, and life cycle costs were determined by process-based material and energy flow analysis, life cycle assessment, and production cost calculation, respectively. The LNG and hydrogen supply chains were compared with a reference chain (coal or diesel) to determine avoided GHG emissions and GHG avoidance costs. Results show that NG with full cryogenic carbon dioxide capture (FCCC) is most beneficial pathway for both avoided GHG emissions and GHG avoidance costs (70.5-112.4 g CO2-e/MJLNG and 66.0-95.9 $/t CO2-e). The best case was obtained when NG with FCCC replaces coal-fired power plants. Results also indicate that hydrogen pathways requires maturation of new technology options and significant capital cost reductions to become attractive. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:本研究评估了中国各种液化天然气(LNG)供应链的技术经济绩效和生命周期温室气体(GHG)排放,以找到最有效的供应方式和使用LNG。本研究通过增加供应链优化选项(冷能回收和氢气生产)来改善目前的文献,并通过分析四种不同LNG最终用户的整个供应链(发电,工业供暖,住宅供热和卡车使用)。这导致33 LNG途径,其中能量效率,生命周期GHG排放和生命周期成本分别由基于过程的材料和能量流分析,生命周期评估和生产成本计算确定。将LNG和氢气供应链与参考链(煤或柴油)进行比较,以确定避免的温室气体排放和避免温室气体避免成本。结果表明,具有全低温二氧化碳捕获(FCCC)的NG是避免温室气体排放和GHG避免成本的最有益的途径(70.5-112.4g CO2-E / MJLNG和66.0-95.9美元/ T CO2-E)。当NG与FCCC取代燃煤发电厂时,获得了最佳案例。结果还表明,氢气途径需要成熟的新技术选择,并且重大资本成本降低变得有吸引力。 (c)2021提交人。 elsevier有限公司出版

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy》 |2021年第1期|120049.1-120049.15|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Groningen Energy & Sustainable Res Inst Groningen Integrated Res Energy Environm & Soc Nijenborgh 6 NL-9747 AG Groningen Netherlands;

    Univ Groningen Energy & Sustainable Res Inst Groningen Integrated Res Energy Environm & Soc Nijenborgh 6 NL-9747 AG Groningen Netherlands;

    Univ Groningen Energy & Sustainable Res Inst Groningen Integrated Res Energy Environm & Soc Nijenborgh 6 NL-9747 AG Groningen Netherlands;

    Univ Groningen Energy & Sustainable Res Inst Groningen Integrated Res Energy Environm & Soc Nijenborgh 6 NL-9747 AG Groningen Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Liquefied natural gas; Techno-economic assessment; Life cycle greenhouse gas emission; Cold recovery; Blue hydrogen;

    机译:液化天然气;技术经济评估;生命周期温室气体排放;冷回收;蓝氢;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号