首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Energy and carbon footprints of wheat establishment following different rice residue management strategies vis-a-vis conventional tillage coupled with rice residue burning in north-western India
【24h】

Energy and carbon footprints of wheat establishment following different rice residue management strategies vis-a-vis conventional tillage coupled with rice residue burning in north-western India

机译:不同水稻残留管理策略后小麦建立的能量和碳足迹vis-a-vis常规耕作与印度西北部的水稻残留物相结合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Energy and carbon (C) footprints have close nexus in agriculture. Agri-inputs are energy intensive and lead to significant C equivalent (CE) emissions. We studied energy and C footprints during wheat establishment following different rice residue management (RRM) strategies: residue retention with Happy Seeder (HS); removal after bailing + zero till drill (ZT); incorporation with rotavator tillage + drill (RT) and mould board plough tillage + drill (MBP) vis-a-vis burning + conventional tillage + drill (CT)to identify options for balancing energy, C footprints and C sequestration. Total energy input (E_I) with residue retention was significantly (p < 0.05) lower by 1540.9-3884.5 MJ ha~(-1) (5.9-13.8%) than residue removal/burning. Although, energy output (E_O) was significantly lower with residue retention/removal, yet energy productivity (E_P) did not differ significantly. Total CE emissions were highest in CT and lowest in ZT. Fertilizer-N was the major hotspot of energy (37.5-45.2% of E_I) and C footprints (53.6-87.9% of total CE emissions). As compared to CT, residue retention offers reduction in C and energy footprints -14.1 and 12.9%, respectively. Results reveal that rice residue burning is not a viable option as it leaves high C footprints and lowers the amount of C added to soil organic C pool and C sustainability.
机译:能量和碳(c)占地面积在农业中近乎封闭。 AGRI输入是能源密集型,导致重要的C等效(CE)排放。在不同水稻残留管理(RRM)策略之后,我们研究了小麦建立期间的能量和C足迹:残留播种机(HS);释放后去除+零直到钻头(ZT);掺入旋转器耕作+钻头(RT)和模具板犁耕作+钻头(MBP)Vis-A-Vis燃烧+常规耕作+钻头(CT),以识别平衡能量,C足迹和C封存的选项。具有残留物保留的总能量输入(E_I)显着(P <0.05)低于1540.9-3884.5 MJ〜(-1)(-1)(5.9-13.8%)比残留物去除/燃烧。虽然,能量输出(E_O)随着残留物保留/去除率明显较低,但能量生产率(E_P)没有显着差异。 CT的CT总排放量最高,ZT中最低。肥料-N是能源的主要热点(e_i的37.5-45.2%)和C足迹(占总CE排放的53.6-87.9%)。与CT相比,残留物保留分别为C和能量占地面积减少-14.1和12.9%。结果表明,水稻残留物燃烧不是一种可行的选择,因为它留下了高C足迹,并降低了土壤有机C池和C可持续性的C的量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号