首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Looking under the hood: A comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models
【24h】

Looking under the hood: A comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models

机译:看着引擎盖:全球和全球综合评估模型的技术经济假设比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Integrated assessment models are extensively used in the analysis of climate change mitigation and are informing national decision makers as well as contribute to international scientific assessments. This paper conducts a comprehensive review of techno-economic assumptions in the electricity sector among fifteen different global and national integrated assessment models. Particular focus is given to six major economies in the world: Brazil, China, the EU, India, Japan and the US. The comparison reveals that techno-economic characteristics are quite different across integrated assessment models, both for the base year and future years. It is, however, important to recognize that techno-economic assessments from the literature exhibit an equally large range of parameters as the integrated assessment models reviewed. Beyond numerical differences, the representation of technologies also differs among models, which needs to be taken into account when comparing numerical parameters. While desirable, it seems difficult to fully harmonize techno-economic parameters across a broader range of models due to structural differences in the representation of technology. Therefore, making techno-economic parameters available in the future, together with of the technology representation as well as the exact definitions of the parameters should become the standard approach as it allows an open discussion of appropriate assumptions. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:综合评估模型广泛用于气候变化缓解分析,并通知国家决策者以及为国际科学评估做出贡献。本文在十五种不同全球和国家综合评估模型中对电力部门的技术经济假设进行了全面审查。特别重点是世界上六个主要经济体:巴西,中国,欧盟,印度,日本和美国。比较揭示了在基准年和未来几年的综合评估模型中的技术经济特征是完全不同的。然而,重要的是要认识到文献的技术经济评估表现出同样大量的参数,因为综合评估模型进行了审查。除了数值差异之外,技术的表示也不同的模型中,在比较数值参数时需要考虑到。虽然理想的是,由于技术代表性的结构差异,似乎难以完全协调跨越更广泛的模型的技术经济参数。因此,将来提供技术经济参数,以及技术代表以及参数的确切定义应该成为标准方法,因为它允许开放的讨论适当的假设。 (c)2019年作者。 elsevier有限公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号