首页> 外文期刊>Energy for sustainable development >Proposal for an international carbon fee
【24h】

Proposal for an international carbon fee

机译:国际碳费提案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A fee on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, applicable equally to all nations and based on the quantity of fossil fuels used in each country, is proposed. Fees would be paid into a UNFCCC-administered fund. Fees would be distributed to nations, according to population, for use in climate change mitigation or adaptation. Advantages and disadvantages of the fee scheme and its effects on various groups of nations are discussed. About 40% of the fees would be net transfers from developed nations to developing nations; 60% of fees would return to their country of origin. Concessions to major fuel exporters may be appropriate. Historical emissions could be included in the fee scheme. A fee provides disincentives to inefficient industrial operations, regardless of location, and avoids trade inequities inherent in unequal national emission caps. Project-based emission reductions of the Clean Development Mechanism could be continued by using fees to buy CERs. A fee scheme would be simpler than alternative climate change treaty proposals but presents problems regarding the appropriate fee level, efficient and fair management of funds, perverse incentives to increase GHG emissions through biofuels production, and political acceptability in nations having greater than average per capita GHG emissions.
机译:提议对所有国家均等适用并根据每个国家使用的化石燃料的量收取温室气体排放费。费用将支付给《气候公约》管理的基金。费用将根据人口分配给各国,用于缓解或适应气候变化。讨论了收费计划的优缺点及其对各个国家的影响。大约40%的费用是从发达国家向发展中国家的净转移; 60%的费用将返回其原籍国。对主要燃料出口商的优惠可能是适当的。历史排放可以包括在费用计划中。收取费用可以抑制效率低下的工业运营,无论其位于何处,并避免不平等的国家排放限额所固有的贸易不平等。清洁发展机制的基于项目的减排可以通过使用费用购买CER来继续进行。收费方案比其他气候变化条约提案要简单,但会带来以下问题:适当的收费水平,资金的有效和公平管理,通过生物燃料生产增加温室气体排放的不正当奖励措施以及人均温室气体排放量高于平均水平的国家的政治接受度排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号