...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy for sustainable development >Life-Cycle Assessment of coal-biomass based electricity in Chile: Focus on using raw vs torrefied wood
【24h】

Life-Cycle Assessment of coal-biomass based electricity in Chile: Focus on using raw vs torrefied wood

机译:智利以煤为生物质的电力的生命周期评估:重点是使用原木还是干木

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this article, the environmental impacts associated to cofiring coal with forest biomass for electricity production in Chile are analyzed for: (i) untreated pine pellets and (ii) torrefied-pretreated pine pellets. Results show that energy production from cofiring coal/untreated wood pellets or coal/torrefied pellets, featured significant reductions in environmental impacts, as compared with pure coal plants. Indeed, reductions in acidification (28-26%), abiotic depletion (15-7%), eutrophication potential (15-12%), global warming potential (16-6%), photochemical oxidation (28-23%), human toxicity (17-15%), terrestrial ecotoxicity (12-9%), and marine aquatic ecotoxicity (17-15%) were obtained when untreated or treated pellets were used as a substitute for coal. Moreover, the environmental profile of torrefied pine evidenced its low impact per energy unit, in most of the studied categories except for eutrophication and marine aquatic ecotoxicity, for which the harvesting, logistic chain and torrefaction processes were the most important contributors. (C) 2015 International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在本文中,分析了以下因素对智利与煤炭和森林生物质共烧发电的环境影响:(i)未经处理的松木颗粒和(ii)焙烧预处理的松木颗粒。结果表明,与纯煤电厂相比,共烧煤/未处理木屑颗粒或煤/焙烧过的丸粒产生的能源可显着减少对环境的影响。确实,减少的酸化(28-26%),非生物耗竭(15-7%),富营养化潜力(15-12%),全球变暖潜力(16-6%),光化学氧化(28-23%),人类当使用未经处理或处理过的颗粒代替煤炭时,可获得毒性(17-15%),陆地生态毒性(12-9%)和海洋水生生态毒性(17-15%)。此外,除其他富营养化和海洋水生生态毒性以外,在大多数研究类别中,松树松的环境特征证明了其每能量单位的影响低,其中富营养化和海洋水生生态毒性是其中最重要的因素。 (C)2015年国际能源计划。由Elsevier Inc.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号