...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy for sustainable development >Synergy and co-benefits of reducing CO_2 and air pollutant emissions by promoting electric vehicles-A case of Shanghai
【24h】

Synergy and co-benefits of reducing CO_2 and air pollutant emissions by promoting electric vehicles-A case of Shanghai

机译:通过促进电动车辆减少CO_2和空气污染物排放的协同作用和共同益处 - 以上海为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

With the growing number of vehicles on the road, the transport sector has become the second largest consumer of energy, after the industrial sector, and has become the main source of air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. To support low-carbon development since 2009, electric vehicles have been used to replace traditional fuel vehicles in China. In 2016, electric vehicles, including buses, taxis and private vehicles, accounted for 26.41% of the total number of new-energy vehicles in Shanghai. In this study, the synergy and co-benefits of reducing CO2 and air pollutant emissions by using electric private cars, taxis, and buses in Shanghai arc analyzed. The co-control coordinate system and pollutant reduction cross-elasticity (Elsa/b) are used to identify and evaluate the generated co-benefits. Based on the total driving life cost, the unit air pollutant equivalent (Ap(eq)) abatement costs of achieving synergy in three types of vehicles are assessed. The co-benefits generated by using the three types of electric vehicles are discussed by combining environmental benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses. The results show that electric buses provide the highest co-benefits. Thus, replacing traditional fuel vehicles with electric buses can simultaneously reduce air pollution and CO2 emissions. If we consider subsidies to electric vehicles provided by the government, there are great environmental and economic benefits of implementing electric buses in Shanghai. In addition, private electric cars and taxis also provide the co-benefits of reducing CO, NOx, NMHC, and PM10 emissions. The economic benefits of using electric taxis in Shanghai are more notable, even without considering subsidies. (C) 2020 International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:随着道路上越来越多的车辆,运输业已成为产业部门后第二大能源消费者,已成为空气污染物和温室气体排放的主要来源。为了支持自2009年以来的低碳开发,电动汽车已被用来取代中国传统燃料车辆。 2016年,包括公共汽车,出租车和私人车辆,包括公共汽车,出租车和私人车辆的电动汽车占上海新能源汽车总数的26.41%。在这项研究中,通过在上海弧线中使用电动私家车,出租车和公共汽车来减少二氧化碳和空气污染物排放的协同作用和共同效益。共控制坐标系和污染物还原交叉弹性(ELSA / B)用于识别和评估产生的共同益处。基于总推动寿命成本,评估了在三种类型的车辆中实现协同作用的单位空气污染物等效物(AP(EQ))减排成本。通过使用环境效益和成本效益分析来讨论通过使用三种电动车产生的共同益处。结果表明,电动巴士提供了最高的共同效益。因此,用电动公交车取代传统燃料汽车可以同时减少空气污染和二氧化碳排放。如果我们考虑补贴政府提供的电动汽车,则在上海实施电动公共汽车存在巨大的环境和经济效益。此外,私人电动汽车和出租车还提供减少CO,NOX,NMHC和PM10排放的共同效益。即使没有考虑补贴,在上海使用电动出租车的经济效益更为显着。 (c)2020国际能源倡议。由elsevier Inc.出版的所有权利保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号