首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >A comparison of discounted cashflow and modern asset pricing methods―project selection and policy implications
【24h】

A comparison of discounted cashflow and modern asset pricing methods―project selection and policy implications

机译:现金流量折现法与现代资产定价方法的比较-项目选择和政策含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We examine the differences in the net present values (NPVs) of North Sea oil projects obtained using the weighted average cost of capital and a modern asset pricing (MAP) method which involves the separate discounting of project cashflow components. NPV differences of more than $10 million were found for some oil projects. Thus, the choice of valuation method will affect the development decisions of oil companies and could influence tax policy. The results of the MAP method are very sensitive to the choice of parameter values for the stochastic process used to model oil prices. Further research is recommended before the MAP method is used as the sole valuation model.
机译:我们研究了使用加权平均资本成本和现代资产定价(MAP)方法获得的北海石油项目净现值(NPV)的差异,该方法涉及项目现金流量成分的单独折现。在某些石油项目中,NPV的差异超过了1000万美元。因此,评估方法的选择将影响石油公司的发展决策并可能影响税收政策。 MAP方法的结果对于用于建模油价的随机过程的参数值的选择非常敏感。建议在将MAP方法用作唯一评估模型之前进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号