...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Implication of CO_2 capture technologies options in electricity generation in Korea
【24h】

Implication of CO_2 capture technologies options in electricity generation in Korea

机译:CO_2捕集技术选择对韩国发电的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper estimates the future mitigation potential and costs of CO_2 reduction technology options to the electricity generation facility in Korea. The monoethanolamine (MEA) absorption, membrane separation, pressure swing adsorption, and O_2/CO_2 input system were selected as the representative CO_2 reduction technology options. In order to analyze the mitigation potential and cost of these options, it uses the long-range energy alternative planning (LEAP) framework for setting future scenarios and assessing the technology options implication. The baseline case of energy planning scenario in Korea is determined in a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario. A BAU scenario is composed of the current account (2003) and future projections for 20 years. Alternative scenarios mainly deal with the installation planning options of CO_2 reduction technology (exogenous capacity, planning time, and existing electric plants). In each alternative scenario analysis, an alternation trend of existing electricity generation facilities was analyzed and the cost of installed CO_2 reduction plants and CO_2 reduction potential was assessed quantitatively.
机译:本文估算了韩国发电设施的未来减排潜力和CO_2减排技术选择的成本。选择单乙醇胺(MEA)吸收,膜分离,变压吸附和O_2 / CO_2输入系统作为代表性的CO_2还原技术选择。为了分析这些方案的缓解潜力和成本,它使用远程能源替代计划(LEAP)框架来设置未来方案并评估技术方案的含义。韩国的能源规划方案的基准情况是按照常使用(BAU)方案确定的。 BAU方案由经常账户(2003年)和对20年的未来预测组成。替代方案主要涉及CO_2减排技术的安装计划选项(外部容量,计划时间和现有电厂)。在每个替代方案分析中,分析了现有发电设施的交替趋势,并定量评估了已安装的CO_2还原厂的成本和CO_2还原潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号