...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Trade-linked Canada-United States household environmental impact analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions
【24h】

Trade-linked Canada-United States household environmental impact analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions

机译:与贸易挂钩的加拿大和美国家庭对能源使用和温室气体排放的环境影响分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compare energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with total household expenditures and activities in Canada and US in 1997, the first detailed estimate of environmental burdens for Canadian households. We estimate direct burdens from published government data and indirect burdens using an industry-by-commodity, bi-national economic input-output life cycle assessment model developed in this study. Comparing 30 expenditure and two activity categories, per capita US household expenditures were 70% higher, while per capita household energy use and GHG emissions were only 10% and 44% higher, respectively. Energy use/dollar of expenditure was higher in most Canadian categories, while the average ratio of GHG emissions/energy use was higher in the US (65 vs 50 kg Eq. CO_2/GJ) due largely to a higher proportion of electricity from nonrenewable sources. Indirect environmental burdens represented 63-69% of total burdens and 62-70% of total burdens were associated with household operation and transportation. Key drivers of differences between energy profiles were: higher per capita electricity use by Canadian households, and higher US household private health care expenditures and motor fuel use. Energy-intensive production for export represented a higher proportion of Canadian production, resulting in less agreement between consumption and production-based analyses for Canada than US.
机译:我们比较了加拿大和美国1997年与家庭总支出和活动相关的能源使用和温室气体(GHG)排放量,这是加拿大家庭对环境负担的第一份详细估算。我们使用已发布的政府数据估算直接负担,并使用本研究开发的行业间商品,两国经济投入-产出生命周期评估模型估算间接负担。比较30种支出和两种活动类别,美国人均家庭支出增加了70%,而人均家庭能源消耗和温室气体排放分别仅增加了10%和44%。在大多数加拿大类别中,能源使用/支出的美元较高,而美国的温室气体排放/能源使用的平均比率较高(65 vs 50千克二氧化碳当量/ GJ),这主要是由于来自非可再生能源的电力比例更高。间接环境负担占总负担的63-69%,总负担的62-70%与家庭经营和运输有关。能源状况差异的主要驱动因素是:加拿大家庭的人均用电量增加,以及美国家庭的私人医疗保健支出和汽车燃料使用量增加。用于出口的能源密集型生产在加拿大生产中所占比例较高,因此加拿大的消费与基于生产的分析之间的一致性较美国差。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2011年第12期|p.8011-8021|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Civil Engineering, 35 St. George St. Toronto, Canada ON M5S 1A4;

    Civil Engineering, 35 St. George St. Toronto, Canada ON M5S 1A4,Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Toronto, 35 St. George St. Toronto, Canada ON M5S 1A4;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    input-output analysis; life cycle assessment; sustainable consumption;

    机译:投入产出分析;生命周期评估;可持续消费;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号