...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Structural reform of Japanese electric power industry: Separation between generation and transmission & distribution
【24h】

Structural reform of Japanese electric power industry: Separation between generation and transmission & distribution

机译:日本电力产业的体制改革:发电与输配电的分离

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines the cost structure of Japanese electric power industry to investigate whether a structural reform on the industry really enhances a cost-saving benefit to consumers. A composite cost function model, using a panel data set, is used for this study. The data set consists of nine electric power companies from 1990 to 2008. Based upon the estimation results, this study examines whether economies of scale and vertical economies exist in the industry. Then, this study conducts a cost subadditivity test that is a necessary condition of natural monopoly. The empirical results indicate that the electric power firms exhibit the status of economies of scale in their transmissions and distributions and the operation as a whole. However, they do not exhibit economies of scale in their generations. Thus, the transmission operation, by integration, in a large area can improve its economic efficiency. Furthermore, the industry should introduce more competition in both generation and wholesale power markets where more firms can participate in their power trades. This study also empirically confirms that vertical economies have existed in the industry. Moreover, this study confirms that all the estimates in the cost subadditivity test satisfy the necessary condition of natural monopoly, where each estimate indicates cost saving in cost subadditivity. The test does not guarantee a sufficient condition of natural monopoly. However, it clearly indicates that the functional separation between generation and transmission will increase total production cost in the industry. The complete separation may result in a net loss of economic efficiency if a competition benefit does not exceed an expected economic loss. Consequently, this study suggests that the industrial structure of future Japanese electric power industry should be evaluated from not only an expected benefit by introducing competition but also an unbundling cost that occurs with a loss of vertical integration.
机译:这项研究研究了日本电力行业的成本结构,以调查该行业的结构性改革是否真正增强了消费者的成本节约效益。本研究使用使用面板数据集的复合成本函数模型。该数据集由1990年至2008年的9家电力公司组成。根据估算结果,本研究研究了行业中是否存在规模经济和垂直经济。然后,本研究进行了成本次可加性检验,这是自然垄断的必要条件。实证结果表明,电力公司在其输配电和整个运营过程中都表现出规模经济的地位。但是,他们几代人都没有规模经济。因此,通过整合在大面积上进行的传动操作可以提高其经济效率。此外,该行业应在发电和批发电力市场中引入更多竞争,使更多的公司可以参与其电力行业。这项研究还凭经验证实该行业已经存在纵向经济。此外,这项研究证实,成本次可加性检验中的所有估计都满足自然垄断的必要条件,其中每个估计都表示成本次可加性中的成本节省。该测试不能保证自然垄断的充分条件。但是,它清楚地表明,发电和输电之间的功能分离将增加该行业的总生产成本。如果竞争收益不超过预期的经济损失,则完全分离可能会导致经济效率的净损失。因此,这项研究表明,不仅应通过引入竞争来从预期收益中评估日本未来电力工业的产业结构,而且还应从垂直整合的损失中考虑分拆成本。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2013年第5期|186-200|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 1-6-1, Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8126, Japan;

    Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 1-6-1, Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8126, Japan;

    New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Department of Management, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    cost subadditivity; vertical economies; scale economies;

    机译:成本次可加性垂直经济规模经济;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号