...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Optimal allocation of energy sources for sustainable development in South Korea: Focus on the electric power generation industry
【24h】

Optimal allocation of energy sources for sustainable development in South Korea: Focus on the electric power generation industry

机译:优化能源资源以促进韩国的可持续发展:专注于发电行业

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

National energy planning has become increasingly complex owing to a pressing need to incorporate sustainability considerations. In this context, we applied least-cost and cost-risk optimization models to allocate energy sources for sustainable development in the Korean electric power generation industry. The least-cost model determined an electricity generation mix from 2012 to 2030 that incurs minimum generation cost to meet electricity demand. The cost-risk model determined electricity generation mixes in 2030 considering the risks associated with each energy source in order to lessen external risks. In deriving these optimal electricity generation mixes, we considered both conventional and renewable energy sources in conjunction with physical and policy constraints that realistically reflect Korean circumstances. Moreover, we accounted for CO_2 and external costs within the electricity generation costs for each energy source. For sustainable development in Korea, we conclude that a portion of the coal and gas in the electricity generation mix must be substituted with nuclear and renewable energy. Furthermore, we found that least-cost allocation is sub-optimal from cost-risk perspective and that it limits the adoption of renewables. Finally, we also discuss the implications of decisions taken by the Korean government regarding the electricity generation mix for next-generation energy planning to achieve sustainability.
机译:由于迫切需要纳入可持续性考虑因素,国家能源计划变得越来越复杂。在这种情况下,我们应用了成本最低和成本风险最优化的模型来分配能源,以实现韩国发电行业的可持续发展。成本最低的模型确定了2012年至2030年的发电组合,产生的最低发电成本可以满足电力需求。成本风险模型确定了2030年的发电量,同时考虑了与每种能源相关的风险,以降低外部风险。在推导这些最佳发电组合时,我们考虑了常规能源和可再生能源,并结合了实际反映韩国情况的物理和政策约束。此外,我们在每种能源的发电成本中考虑了CO_2和外部成本。为了实现韩国的可持续发展,我们得出结论,发电混合物中的一部分煤炭和天然气必须用核能和可再生能源替代。此外,我们发现从成本风险的角度来看,最低成本分配是次优的,并且限制了可再生能源的采用。最后,我们还将讨论韩国政府有关发电组合的决定对实现可持续发展的下一代能源计划的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2015年第3期|78-90|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Samsung Economic Research Institute, 29th Floor, Samsung Life Seocho Tower, Seocho 2-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-955, South Korea;

    Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, San 56-1, Sillim-Dong, Kwanak-Gu, Seoul 151-742, South Korea;

    Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, San 56-1, Sillim-Dong, Kwanak-Gu, Seoul 151-742, South Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Energy planning; Sustainable development; Optimization model;

    机译:能源规划;可持续发展;优化模型;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号